Immigrants from Micronesia vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,602,478 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.265% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 264.7 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $52,832, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($90,345 compared to $85,647, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $35,688, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $80,515, a difference of 0.040%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $50,279, a difference of 0.82%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $46,419, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.76%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.1%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.0%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.59%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.2%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.3%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.96%).