Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,974,354 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 46.9 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $93,569, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $101,170, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $86,255, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $63,187, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,423, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.90%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.4%).