Immigrants from Micronesia vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,753,822 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 226.5 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $52,072, a difference of 17.1%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $47,448, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $47,066, a difference of 0.23%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $37,589, a difference of 0.33%), and median earnings ($41,133 compared to $41,448, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.2%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.95%).