Immigrants from Micronesia vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,505,224 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.713% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 712.5 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $112,666, a difference of 39.9%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $63,827, a difference of 35.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $118,426, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $57,003, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $68,822, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.0%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 80.3%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 71.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.0%).