Immigrants from Micronesia vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,934,744 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $50,475, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $79,171, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $45,816, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $46,656, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($41,133 compared to $40,107, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $34,106, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.3%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 16.8%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 10.2%), college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 92.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female disability (13.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.6%).