Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Latvia
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,163,297 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 33.8 Immigrants from Latvia.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $50,914, a difference of 35.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $105,522, a difference of 31.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $61,422, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,737, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $64,298, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Exceptional $50,914 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Exceptional $114,826 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Exceptional $93,602 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Exceptional $51,555 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Exceptional $61,422 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Exceptional $43,099 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Fair $51,737 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Exceptional $105,522 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Exceptional $111,454 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Exceptional $64,298 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 20.4% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
| Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.0% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Average 65.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 80.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Good 36.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Family Households | Average 64.2% | Tragic 62.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Fair 46.0% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.9%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 88.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Tragic 52.2% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 80.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 77.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
| 10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 88.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 70.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 52.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Average 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 21.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Exceptional 46.2% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.2% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.0% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |