Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Micronesia

Brazilians

Fair
Good
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,598,617 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.452% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 451.9 Brazilians.
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Brazilian Communities

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $46,700, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $98,267, a difference of 22.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $56,837, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,465, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,335, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,464
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,345
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,574
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,133
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,177
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,477
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,691
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,544
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,864
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,000
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
26.7%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.1%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.8%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.2%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.6%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.2%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaBrazilian
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%