Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Micronesia

Immigrants from Ecuador

Fair
Poor
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,044,802 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $54,030, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $89,673, a difference of 11.3%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $41,195, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,345 compared to $92,837, a difference of 2.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $91,462, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,464
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,345
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,574
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,133
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,177
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,477
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,691
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,544
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,864
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,000
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
22.5%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.77%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.0%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.8%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.2%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
33.7%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 136.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 54.8%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
4.2%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.5%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.2%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.9%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%