Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,839,488 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.614% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 1,614.2 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $54,512, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $45,529, a difference of 11.3%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $47,070, a difference of 0.23%), median earnings ($41,133 compared to $41,325, a difference of 0.47%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $89,285, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 21.4%), poverty (13.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 12.0%), currently married (45.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households (64.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.6%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.2%).