Immigrants from Micronesia vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,302,338 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 22.6 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $94,610, a difference of 17.5%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $43,461, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,827, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $59,535, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,173, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.09, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%).