Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Micronesia

Guatemalans

Fair
Poor
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,612,297 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 203.6 Guatemalans.
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $54,526, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $88,295, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,133 compared to $41,205, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $87,705, a difference of 0.18%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $75,961, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,464
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,345
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,574
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,133
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,177
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,477
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,691
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,544
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,864
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,000
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
22.6%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.22%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.0%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.8%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
81.2%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.5%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.40, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.2%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
37.1%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 65.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.2%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaGuatemalan
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%