Immigrants from Micronesia vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,765,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 36.7 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $45,858, a difference of 22.4%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $57,286, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $97,625, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $62,230, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $52,336, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $39,724, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.8%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.3%).