Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,030,783 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 17.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $99,900, a difference of 24.0%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $46,459, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $106,611, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $63,957, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,185, a difference of 4.9%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.7%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%).