Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chinese
9.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,589,197 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 50.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 19.1% |
| Range | 22.1% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 6.8% |
| Median | 9.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |