Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,464,460 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 142.2 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $51,770, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $106,888, a difference of 32.7%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $62,217, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $66,376, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.14, a difference of 5.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Average 64.2% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 79.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |