Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,005,982 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $46,213, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $97,159, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $55,954, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $62,354, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.3%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%).