Immigrants from Micronesia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,388,176 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 36.0 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $93,694, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $54,722, a difference of 16.0%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $52,672, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $57,975, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,436, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.2%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.8%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.07, a difference of 8.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.87%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.79%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.020%), female disability (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%).