Immigrants from Micronesia vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,609,499 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 167.7 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.6%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $53,925, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $91,668, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $50,336, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $58,847, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $37,531, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.68%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%).