Immigrants from Micronesia vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,228,437 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.888. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 99.9 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $52,074, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $107,912, a difference of 34.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $62,857, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,739, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $66,891, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 81.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.3%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%).