Immigrants from Micronesia vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,181,196 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 47.1 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $54,474, a difference of 12.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $87,751, a difference of 8.9%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $79,737, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,345 compared to $92,231, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $36,904, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $49,215, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 11.3%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (64.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.8%).