Immigrants from Micronesia vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,999,786 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 14.5 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $51,875, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $107,269, a difference of 33.2%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $61,710, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,523, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $67,926, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.37%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 87.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.0%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%).