Immigrants from Micronesia vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,575,320 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.2%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $44,440, a difference of 18.6%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $55,793, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $50,554, a difference of 0.27%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,735, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,397, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.97%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 49.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%).