Immigrants from Micronesia vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,824,989 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 58.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $44,822, a difference of 36.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $72,093, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $77,044, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($41,133 compared to $38,949, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $50,547, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 73.3%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.4%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 41.6%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.20%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.0%), associate's degree (40.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.63%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 85.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.1%).