Immigrants from Micronesia vs Armenian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,620,051 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 47.4 Armenians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $48,287, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $103,248, a difference of 28.2%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $58,134, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,656, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,179, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.2%), single female poverty (23.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.37%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and poverty (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 65.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.2%).