Immigrants from Micronesia vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,991,643 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.703. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.244% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 1,244.3 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $90,722, a difference of 12.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $98,778, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $84,729, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,078, a difference of 4.7%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $39,403, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.6%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (45.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.6%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.2%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%).