Immigrants from Micronesia vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,787,734 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.590% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 590.3 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $88,446, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $37,905, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($41,133 compared to $43,393, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,574 compared to $76,383, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.6%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), poverty (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 99.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 95.7%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.5%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 54.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.72%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (13.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.5%).