Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,698,498 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.237% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 237.0 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $46,430, a difference of 23.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $97,305, a difference of 20.8%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $56,958, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $60,647, a difference of 0.58%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,593, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 58.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.4%).