Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,458,439 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.638. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 25.8 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $56,584, a difference of 51.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $120,333, a difference of 49.4%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $67,698, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $68,495, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $57,075, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 47.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.4%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 94.6%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 89.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%).