Immigrants from Micronesia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,359,567 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 31.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $32,345, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $75,945, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $44,003, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $82,064, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 62.1%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 134.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 113.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 43.3%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.5%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.93%).