Immigrants from Micronesia vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,390,827 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $95,511, a difference of 18.6%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $55,731, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,621, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,493, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $37,904, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.1%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.4%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.6%).