Immigrants from Micronesia vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,933,317 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 48.1 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $40,429, a difference of 14.0%), median earnings ($41,133 compared to $46,440, a difference of 12.9%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $42,164, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $60,043, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $52,594, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $98,877, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and female poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.1%), currently married (45.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 63.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 44.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.4%).