Swiss vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swiss
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swiss
Houma
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Swiss Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,778,330 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.806. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 46.3 Houma.
Swiss vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $44,822, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $76,188, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $44,356, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $38,949, a difference of 18.9%).
Income Metric | Swiss | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,076 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,396 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,681 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,315 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,731 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,904 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,493 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,511 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $103,071 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,621 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 38.7% |
Swiss vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 77.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.3%).
Poverty Metric | Swiss | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 16.5% |
Swiss vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 79.9%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Swiss | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Swiss vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swiss | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.3% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 74.1% |
Swiss vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Swiss | Houma |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 46.6% |
Swiss vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 57.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swiss | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.0% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Swiss vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 105.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 102.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Swiss | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 0.96% |
Swiss vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 61.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.4%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%).
Disability Metric | Swiss | Houma |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |