Fijian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,723,133 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.548% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 1,548.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 68.7%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $44,822, a difference of 26.7%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $62,575, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,193 compared to $38,949, a difference of 3.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $77,044, a difference of 3.8%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 70.5%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 69.9%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 88.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 59.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 34.0%), associate's degree (37.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 60.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 14.5%).