Navajo vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,500,833 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.680. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 72.9%), median male earnings ($42,098 compared to $50,547, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $77,044, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $72,093, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $44,356, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $38,949, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 85.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (30.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.7%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and female unemployment (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in currently married (39.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 16.8%), average family size (3.65 compared to 3.18, a difference of 14.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 67.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 40.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.4%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and male disability (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (58.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.8%).