German Russian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,816,834 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.446% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 445.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $72,093, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $44,822, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,924 compared to $50,547, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $44,356, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,220 compared to $77,044, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 72.2%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 68.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 40.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 84.9%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 79.0%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 18.8%).