Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Houma

Excellent
Tragic
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,396,010 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.981. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 6.902% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 6,901.5 Houma.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $72,093, a difference of 55.6%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $32,996, a difference of 51.2%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.7%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $50,547, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $38,949, a difference of 30.3%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 99.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 86.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 86.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 41.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.1%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.8%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.5%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 126.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 119.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 74.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandHouma
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Good
12.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%