Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Houma

Poor
Tragic
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,153,311 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 21.5 Houma.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 84.6%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $30,343, a difference of 31.5%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $62,575, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $50,547, a difference of 2.2%), median earnings ($45,532 compared to $38,949, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $77,044, a difference of 17.4%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 80.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 64.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 50.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 124.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 40.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 100.5%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 91.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 118.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 75.0%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHouma
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%