Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Houma
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,885,253 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.521% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 5,521.2 Houma.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $32,996, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $72,093, a difference of 42.6%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $44,356, a difference of 10.7%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $50,547, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $38,949, a difference of 24.8%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 38.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 93.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.5%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 39.9%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 50.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 46.6% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 136.0%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 0.96% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.2%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.3%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Houma |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |