Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Houma

Good
Tragic
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,885,253 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.521% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 5,521.2 Houma.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Houma Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $32,996, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $72,093, a difference of 42.6%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $44,356, a difference of 10.7%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $50,547, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $38,949, a difference of 24.8%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
38.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 93.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.5%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 39.9%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
74.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 50.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.8%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
46.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 136.0%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
0.96%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.2%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.3%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynHouma
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%