Nonimmigrants vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,455,447 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $72,093, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $44,822, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $50,547, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $44,356, a difference of 11.3%), and median earnings ($44,117 compared to $38,949, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 60.9%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.7%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 31.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.26%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 75.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 75.5%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 43.3%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.3%).