Taiwanese vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Houma
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,612,713 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.970. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 167.7 Houma.
Taiwanese vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 53.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $72,093, a difference of 44.5%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $62,575, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $44,356, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($47,902 compared to $38,949, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 38.7% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 115.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 93.0%), and single father poverty (14.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 23.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.0%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 93.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 60.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 46.6% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 124.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 115.6%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Taiwanese vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 89.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 84.1%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.8%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |