Indian (Asian) vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Indian (Asian)
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Indians (Asian)

Houma

Good
Tragic
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,781,547 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Houma.
Indian (Asian) Integration in Houma Communities

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $72,093, a difference of 69.7%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $62,575, a difference of 68.2%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $76,188, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $50,547, a difference of 30.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $44,356, a difference of 31.3%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $38,949, a difference of 44.4%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Income
Income MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$53,874
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,312
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,262
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,253
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$66,078
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,481
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,239
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,496
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,343
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,238
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
38.7%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 108.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 103.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 97.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.7%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.5%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.8%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.9%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.9%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
74.1%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 84.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
46.6%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.0%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.1%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.9%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 203.7%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 194.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 158.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.27%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.8%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.9%
Tragic
0.96%

Indian (Asian) vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 111.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 98.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.6%).
Indian (Asian) vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricIndian (Asian)Houma
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%