Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Houma

Good
Tragic
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,971,264 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 92.1 Houma.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($111,519 compared to $62,575, a difference of 78.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $72,093, a difference of 76.8%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $76,188, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $50,547, a difference of 38.8%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $44,356, a difference of 40.0%), and wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 51.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 124.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 119.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 73.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 97.5%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 64.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 189.5%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 189.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 158.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 128.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.9%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 97.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHouma
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%