Arapaho vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,241,585 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.676% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 675.7 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 64.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $44,822, a difference of 32.5%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $50,547, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $44,356, a difference of 0.80%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $32,996, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $30,343, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 102.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 79.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.64 compared to 3.18, a difference of 14.4%), currently married (40.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 90.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 55.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.3%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and associate's degree (36.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 91.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%).