Portuguese vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,764,433 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 18.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $72,093, a difference of 46.1%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $62,575, a difference of 42.2%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $50,547, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.7%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $38,949, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 81.2%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 74.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.5%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.28%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 83.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.48%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 56.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 51.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.6%).