Lithuanian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,593,513 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 132.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $72,093, a difference of 56.0%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $76,188, a difference of 51.5%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $44,356, a difference of 20.7%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $50,547, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $38,949, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 103.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 87.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 53.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.5%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 57.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 142.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 135.7%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 124.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 73.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 24.6%).