Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tlingit-Haida

Cherokee

Average
Fair
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,661,157 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Cherokee.
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Cherokee Communities

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,516 compared to $37,203, a difference of 17.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $47,848, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $54,133, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $48,669, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($45,468 compared to $41,252, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,417 compared to $86,125, a difference of 13.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,516
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,092
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,968
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,468
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,409
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,513
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,914
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,987
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,417
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,922
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.3%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 110.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.91%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.7%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.2%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2nd grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.75%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricTlingit-HaidaCherokee
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%