Aleut vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,891,335 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $86,125, a difference of 16.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $54,133, a difference of 15.8%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $48,669, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($44,241 compared to $41,252, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.96%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 68.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and college, 1 year or more (55.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.8%).