Italian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Italian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Italians

Cherokee

Excellent
Fair
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Italian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,110,329 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 40.8 Cherokee.
Italian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Italian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $80,843, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $86,125, a difference of 28.0%), and per capita income ($47,574 compared to $37,203, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $54,133, a difference of 18.0%).
Italian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricItalianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,574
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,372
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,475
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,915
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,551
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,505
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,426
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,215
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,224
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,885
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Italian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 43.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.9%).
Italian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricItalianCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.2%

Italian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Italian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricItalianCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Italian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Italian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricItalianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.1%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Italian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Italian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricItalianCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Tragic
36.7%

Italian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%).
Italian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricItalianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Italian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.6%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Italian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricItalianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.1%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Italian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
Italian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricItalianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%