Uruguayan vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,424,882 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 332.7 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $37,203, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $72,682, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $80,843, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $54,133, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.1%).