Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Panama

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,976,328 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.254% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 253.7 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $37,203, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $34,742, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $54,133, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,853
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,647
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,873
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,198
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,962
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,278
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,451
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,815
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,944
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.8%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 89.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.7%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.1%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.7%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PanamaCherokee
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%